Friday, March 9, 2012

Which is the better RTS? Command and Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars or WARHAMMER 40,000: Dawn of War II?

READ THE TITLE!Which is the better RTS? Command and Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars or WARHAMMER 40,000: Dawn of War II?
like mathew says



i say C%26amp;C cause i like building bases

still warhammer is a good game but if u like non base building i suggest Worldshift



(total annihilation and starcraft are far more advanced then c%26amp;c)

maybe graphical c%26amp;c is better but starcraft 2 and supreme commander

make c%26amp;c look like kidsplay



did you know about lord of the rings battle for middle earth2 wrath of the lich king?

(also have turnbased but i like base builder version)



Yours sincerely Xplizit xpressWhich is the better RTS? Command and Conquer 3: Tiberium Wars or WARHAMMER 40,000: Dawn of War II?
if you like buolding bases then not warhammer i ahve the fiorst one with all the expansions but number 2 is different. C%26amp;C3 is good but i still like warhammer

1 comment:

  1. Dawn of War, the original series, if you like base-building. It is easily the best RTS I have ever played. Dawn of War II is very tactical and has no base building, and small armies. If you want larger armies, base building, and a very tactical RTS, play Company of Heroes. It's the in-between of DoW I and DoW II. Command and Conquer is fun, but it is not very tactical in the fact that it is mostly just troop movements that make the difference when play (also, who can rush the fastest). Starcraft was good 12 years ago, it is not very tactical, and it is more like Command and Conquer. I suggest Command and Conquer over Starcraft, and I suggest Dawn of War/Company of Heroes over Command and Conquer. There are very very many play styles from those games that you can incorporate. Have fun with the RTSs :D

    ReplyDelete